🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are watching closely to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our kids' innocence". A law may be passed soon.
• The Norwegian government is planning to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a online verification tool to authenticate the age and identity of social media users. The media minister have stated that an similar ban could be "one of the measures under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has called on the legislature to approve a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In The French government, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a government panel has suggested a comparable action, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The government in The Dutch government has advised parents to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory motion calling for a ban for teenagers under 16 except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Even though it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age limit is a solid starting point," said a leading European lawmaker behind the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a future ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any decision must be "supported by conclusive data".

Previously, momentum built behind a bill to impose restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually weakened. Instead, the administration committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who died after viewing disturbing online content contends that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to design tools that are appropriate and suitable for young users," stated a leading online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Stateside, legislation is primarily happening at the local level amid national inaction.

• The state of Utah requires guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and restricts late-night use.
• Florida has signed a bill barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has enacted a law restricting minors to a single hour of social media access per day, with extra access dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring guardian approval for minors to open social media presences.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some politicians to mimic this example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

Global Perspectives

Beyond the West, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the required age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations adopt a more cautious position. The UN children's agency has advised that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "might prove counterproductive". The agency notes that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this international conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and others show that states globally are no longer prepared to delay for the industry to self-regulate.